Close Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Market
  • Exchanges
  • Opinion
  • Regulatory
  • Mining
  • Report
  • All Posts
What's Hot

Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan States That Bitcoin Should Not Be Included in U.S. Stockpiles

Jun. 11, 2025

Pro-Bitcoin Scott Bessent Announces Candidacy for Next Federal Reserve Chair

Jun. 11, 2025

VanEck, 21Shares, and Canary Call on SEC to Reinstate ‘First to File, First to Approve’ Standard for Crypto ETFs

Jun. 11, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
X (Twitter) Telegram
Fin Date
  • Home
  • News
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Market
  • Exchanges
  • Opinion
  • Regulatory
  • Mining
  • Report
  • All Posts
Subscribe
Fin Date
You are at:Home ยป Investing in L2 vs Investing in ETH Which has a brighter future
Opinion

Investing in L2 vs Investing in ETH Which has a brighter future

By adminJan. 1, 2023No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Investing in L2 vs Investing in ETH Which has a brighter future
Investing in L2 vs Investing in ETH Which has a brighter future
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

Author: James Ho
Translated by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Investing in L2 vs ETH

Over the past few years, Layer 2 (L2) solutions on Ethereum have made significant strides. Currently, the total value locked (TVL) on Ethereum’s L2 exceeds $40 billion, compared to just $10 billion a year ago. On platforms like @l2 beat, there are over 50 L2 projects, with the top 5-10 projects holding over 90% of the TVL.

Following the implementation of EIP-4844, transaction fees have drastically reduced, with costs on platforms like Base and Arbitrum dropping to less than $0.01 per transaction.

Despite substantial advancements in technology and adoption, L2 tokens have generally underperformed as speculative investments compared to ETH (though they shine as venture investments). Numerous jokes and anecdotes circulate about the poor performance of L2 tokens relative to ETH.

We examined the valuation of major L2s compared to ETH. A notable observation is that despite an increase in the number of listed L2s, their combined fully diluted valuation (FDV) relative to ETH has remained stable.

Two years ago, the only listed L2s were Optimism and Polygon, which represented 8% of ETH’s FDV. Today, with projects like Arbitrum, Starkware, and zkSync, their FDV accounts for 9% of ETH.

Each new listing of an L2 token essentially dilutes the FDV of previously listed L2 tokens.

Investing in L2 tokens has resulted in significantly poorer performance relative to ETH. Returns over the past 12 months are as follows:
ETH: +105%
OP: +77%
MATIC: -3%
ARB: -12%

Historically, the combined FDV of major L2 tokens has hovered around $10 billion. This valuation seems somewhat arbitrary, lacking strong market rationale whether it’s $10 billion, $20 billion, or $3 billion. Ultimately, significant supply pressure exists due to demand liquidity and/or substantial unlocks.

These L2s generate monthly fees ranging from $20 million to $30 million. Since the implementation of EIP-4844, fees have decreased to $3 million to $4 million per month, equating to an annualized cost of $40 million to $50 million.

Currently, the total FDV of major L2 tokens is approximately $40 billion, with annualized fees of $40 million, resulting in a valuation multiple of around 1,000 times.

This sharply contrasts with large DeFi protocols, which typically have valuation multiples ranging from 15 to 60 times (based on last month’s annualized fees):
DYDX: 60x
SNX: 50x
PENDLE: 50x
LDO: 40x
AAVE: 20x
MKR: 15x
GMX: 15x

With more L2 projects coming to market, FDV of L2 tokens may face continued pressure and dilution. The market is saturated, making it challenging for the liquid market to support.

Conclusion

Long-term, L2s could generate significant fee revenue. L2s generate $150 million in fees annually (including Base, Blast, Scroll), and this figure could grow significantly with increased L2 activity.

The above is not specific to any particular L2 project but rather a broad observation of the category. Purchasing a basket of L2 tokens with approximately $40 billion FDV and $40 million in fees (1,000x), and expecting them to outperform ETH in the long run, appears challenging.

Clearly, there is no shortage of block space between L2s and high-throughput chains like Solana, Sui, and Aptos. The limiting factor lies in applications utilizing this block space. I hope future focus will shift more towards the application layer, as the liquid market is likely to reward the application layer over infrastructure in the coming years.

In the previous cycle, projects often listed significantly undervalued. MATIC was initially listed with an FDV below $50 million and has now surpassed $5 billion, growing over 100 times. However, this isn’t necessarily the case for recent L2 tokens like $OP, $ARB, $STRK, $ZK, and others likely to be listed.

—

Note: Proper nouns and

placeholders were retained as requested.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Pro-Bitcoin Scott Bessent Announces Candidacy for Next Federal Reserve Chair

Jun. 11, 2025

VanEck, 21Shares, and Canary Call on SEC to Reinstate ‘First to File, First to Approve’ Standard for Crypto ETFs

Jun. 11, 2025

Truth Social Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF Registered in Nevada

Jun. 11, 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Open and Friendly Germanys Taxation and Regulatory System for Cryptocurrency Assets

Feb. 27, 2018

Exploring Covenants: How to Bring Native Programmability to Bitcoin

May. 29, 2019

Major Fund Invests in Changelight Technology Packaging Giant Sees New Opportunities

Oct. 22, 2019

The Biggest Advantage for Bitcoin Will It Materialize This Year

Mar. 3, 2020
Don't Miss
Bitcoin

Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan States That Bitcoin Should Not Be Included in U.S. Stockpiles

Jun. 11, 2025

Key Takeaways Jamie Dimon believes the US should prioritize military assets over Bitcoin in its s…

Pro-Bitcoin Scott Bessent Announces Candidacy for Next Federal Reserve Chair

Jun. 11, 2025

VanEck, 21Shares, and Canary Call on SEC to Reinstate ‘First to File, First to Approve’ Standard for Crypto ETFs

Jun. 11, 2025

Guggenheim Treasury of Wall Street Launches Its Premier Tokenized Debt Instrument on the XRP Ledger

Jun. 11, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
About Us
About Us

Fin Date is your ultimate companion for exploring the world of cryptocurrency. We offer comprehensive and in-depth news coverage along with expert analysis to help you stay abreast of the latest developments in the cryptocurrency market.

X (Twitter) Telegram
Our Picks

Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan States That Bitcoin Should Not Be Included in U.S. Stockpiles

Jun. 11, 2025

Pro-Bitcoin Scott Bessent Announces Candidacy for Next Federal Reserve Chair

Jun. 11, 2025

VanEck, 21Shares, and Canary Call on SEC to Reinstate ‘First to File, First to Approve’ Standard for Crypto ETFs

Jun. 11, 2025
Most Popular

Open and Friendly Germanys Taxation and Regulatory System for Cryptocurrency Assets

Feb. 27, 2018

Exploring Covenants: How to Bring Native Programmability to Bitcoin

May. 29, 2019

Major Fund Invests in Changelight Technology Packaging Giant Sees New Opportunities

Oct. 22, 2019
© 2025 Fin Date All rights reserved.
  • Home
  • News
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Market
  • Exchanges
  • Opinion
  • Regulatory
  • Mining
  • Report
  • All Posts

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.